Home
List of Articles
|
 |
Does Your CD Cover $ell (Or Suck)?
Oh, I know the last part of the title (Suck) isn't a very
pleasant description to apply to anyone's CD cover. But, in the
interest of plain old honesty, and to face our demons head on, I
wanted to (again) utilize a worst case scenario that we can only
improve from.
And, having said that, think of the average (and not so
average) recording artist's CD cover, and I'll bet you will
agree that 9 out of 10 CD covers present the artist simply
posing while staring straight into the camera.
And, the few artists who want to appear different, unique and
diverse, simply either turn sideways, stare into deep space, or
gaze downward or backward for their photo sessions.
If you happen to be among the aforementioned guilty, you should
realize that by *not* becoming more proactive and aggressive
with the visual aspect and design of your CD cover, you are
shortchanging the potential of your release from the onset, and
not giving it its best possible chance for maximum success.
I first began noticing this overall trend when CDs began
replacing albums. And, I believe that the difference was due, in
part, to the dramatic reduction in the cover size.
Consequently, I felt that both labels and artists, perhaps,
decided (consciously or unconsciously) that the reduction in
size did not allow enough room for visual creativity, which is
not the case.
But, those are only two reasons. For, I also believe that,
while they may be decent to great professional music producers,
I have found that most recording artists whom I encounter are
amateurs, at best, in respect to marketing their releases from a
visual perspective.
And, it's not their fault, because 'visual' just doesn't happen
to be the medium in which they work. However, this isn't to say
that they can't learn to become much better at pre-selling their
releases visually.
But, as an artist, perhaps, your argument is that your music
is, primarily, based on the "sonic" aspect...that it will mainly
be "heard" and not "seen."
This is, in part, true but also consider that, generally,
before your music is HEARD, it is first SEEN (unless you are
sending 'plain vanilla' promotion singles to radio or handing
them out at will to friends, associates, etc.). And, here is
how:
Radio:
Due to added expense, most independent labels forego
manufacturing 'singles' and, thus, usually send their complete
retail releases out as promotion copies to the media. Hence, the
radio music directors and program directors will SEE your
release before they open your case to HEAR your music.
And, as the MD/PD takes your CD out of its package, does it,
*POW!*, hit him with a bang visually, and immediately instill
deeper interest *BEFORE* he hears your music?
Or does your, possibly, average to boring cover instill a blasé
feeling that causes the MD/PD to presume that your music is,
yet, another below average release, and is a further waste of
his valuable time without giving it, at least, a listen?
* Press
The same thing applies to press music editors, reviewers and
calendar editors as with radio personnel. Will the press
personnel see a boring, posing cover and get that "Geez, here we
go again" feeling, or will they assume that your lackadaisical
cover will be accompanied by even more boring content, such as
your bio, press release, fact sheet, etc.?
* Retail Consumers
While many potential retail consumers will, indeed, "hear" your
music first (on radio or in nightclubs), there are also many
more potential retail consumers who will not.
And, these particular consumers are the ones who either go to
music retailers weekly for new releases and spend additional
time browsing, or they may be consumers who are simply weekly
browsers seeking the new, unique and creative 'next big thing'.
In either case, for the consumers who espy your CD in their
favorite music retail stores...does your cover jump out at them
visually, make an immediate impact, and cause them to do a
'double take'?
Does it then make them pick up a copy of your release, maintain
their interest and force them to read your credits and song
titles?
Subsequently, does it then drive them to a listening station
for further review and, hopefully, purchasing it?
Or, will they simply look at, yet, another boring cover and go,
"Eh," and replace it for your competitor's that is far more
visually attractive, and your competitor's who may also have
read this particular article, with one exception...he acted on
this information while you did not? :-)
Self-Realization:
Now, get a copy of your CD and take a look at it...I mean take
a *really* good look at it. Then, using the radio, press and
consumer theoretical perspectives above, honestly ask yourself
if your cover has visually maximized its full potential.
Does it readily subscribe to the old U. S. Army slogan, "Be all
you can be?" Is it, truly, all that it can be? Is it the best
possible cover that you could ever hope for with this release?
Or, do you realize for the first time that you have both
shortchanged yourself and your release, and that your cover is
probably causing you to lose some significant sales, as it
could, indeed, be presented to both the media and consumers much
better?
If you now harbor the slightest inkling of doubt, after having
given your cover another look, it is also safe to assume that
your cover may be a bit questionable to others and,
particularly, media professionals as well.
So, let's say that you now realize that your cover is below
par, and could be much better...that you can now admit that you
truly did not give it your absolute best shot...that, in fact,
your cover was an afterthought, at best. How do you get started
on "conceptualizing" it from a visual standpoint?
Well, one way is to first consider your title...
If this is your debut release, can you make something unusually
funny or witty out of your first or last name? Can either your
first or last name present a double meaning, such as Byrd, Love,
Green, Wolf, Young?
While those of us with such names are often ridiculed in our
early school days, we have the advantage of our "weird" last
names standing out and benefiting us in our professional
careers. :-)
If your release has a subtitle, or this is your second or
additional release, can you put a twist on its title?
The same goes for your songs. I'm betting that you have, at
least, one song, regardless of your genre, that can be selected
as the title and used as the basis for a very attractive cover
and graphic depiction of your music.
About the author:
Kenny Love is president of MuBiz.com, a multi-service music firm
providing radio promotion, media publicity, gig publicity and
business services for musicians. Get complete details at
http://www.myspace.com/kenlove
Written by: Kenny Love
|
 |
Recent Articles
Learning Styles Of Music
What genres (music types) are important?
Learning styles of music can help you get work, don’t get me wrong; but you need to consider the time and expense involved in knowing a lot of music genre’s, having the goods to do them, and if your...
Polychords and the Jazz Improviser: How to Practice & Apply Polychords to Improv
In the world of music, many Jazz improvisers and Classical composers eventually venture into exploring poly-harmony within their respective art form. Poly harmony is the simultaneous sounding of more than one harmonic concept. The preponderance with...
So You Wanna Learn How To Start a Record Label?
Well, you love music so much that you have decided you want to learn how to start a record label of your own. This can be a very exciting step and a fun one. The good news is, anyone can start their own record label if they know the right steps....
Things to look for when buying a studio microphone
Studio microphones need to accomplish one thing and one thing
only: to record the best possible voice or musical instrument
sounds. In order to do that, they use advanced technological
methods to filter out unwanted ambient sound, which are...
|